Ask Peggy to sample public AI answers, trace their cited sources and prepare evidence-led improvements to your public content.
With Peggy, Marketer
Example brief · Hypothetical workflow
Sample public answers to our buyers’ product-comparison questions. Record the date, wording and sources, then recommend useful corrections to our public pages.
I’ll capture what the sample actually says, trace the sources and prepare content changes for review.
See example output ↓Starts: Your scheduled research check runs for a defined set of customer questions.
Peggy uses the questions, markets and competitors you specify. Each observation records the query, service, date and accessible answer or cited source. A single answer is a sample, not a measure of every user’s experience.
Peggy compares the sampled claims with your actual product documentation. Missing explanations, outdated facts and unclear comparisons become proposed changes with source links, rather than promises about how an AI system will respond.
You get an editorial brief or drafts for the connected publishing workflow. Authorized reviewers approve factual changes. A later sample uses the same questions and records differences without attributing them to your edits unless the evidence supports it.
The work is research and public-content improvement. It does not guarantee inclusion in ChatGPT answers or a change in rankings.
Hypothetical finished result
AI-answer content brief
Hypothetical: a public comparison answer describes an old account-setup requirement.
Connect the accounts and actions for your workflow. Start in Artie or add your Artisan to Slack; access stays within your account permissions.
Explore appsNo. Peggy researches observable public answers and improves useful source content. Answer inclusion and rankings are outside this workflow’s control.
Compare dated samples taken with the same question set and method. The report describes the sample and its limits rather than claiming a universal visibility score.
She can prepare the content. Publication depends on the connected CMS capability, allowed actions and your review requirements.
